by Len Harris
Here is a prime example of how lifeless libs spin the truth so as to make the story fit their agenda. This person that goes by ellen1 commented here, notice how completely untrue her statement is and then she reduces herself to name calling, because after she says all she has to say, that is all she has. After being censored for posting inappropriate content along comes ehancock1 from the same IP address: 184.108.40.206 and email address: email@example.com as ellen1. Curiosity got the better of the administration and ehancock1’s post was pulled from the spam queue, reviewed and approved to be posted here. However here is the price you pay ehoncock1 and ellen1: I get to show the utterly twisted way that you think to the world!
It is laughable how ehoncock1 attempts to give credence to the veracity of Akaobama’s nativity story, as you will see!
Ehoncock1’s rather lengthy diatribe, replete with arguments that cannot be won as they lack substance is redundant and as you will see downright scandalous. He sticks to the old worn out talking points that is all the left has and he has regurgitated so frequently that he actually believes it even though what he sourced by links are irrelevant to the issue and in some cases even bolster the opposing view. The truth is right in front of him, but he can’t see the forest through the trees. Remember: Liberalism is a mental disorder.
That having been said here is his argument verbatim with(CORRECTIONS IN THE TEXT APEARING LIKE THIS):
You’d like evidence?(Yes I would, but you ain’t got none.) Well, let’s begin.
Hawaii has stated that it sent the birth certificates to Obama, and the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have confirmed that there is a birth certificate on file and that the facts on it match those on the birth certificate in the files, and there were birth notices sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. (OK the facts match however that does nothing for the facts on the original that are omitted on the abstract. Here is a copy of Akaobama’s BC posted on the Honolulu Star Advertiser notice line 23:)
(Kenyan birth registered in Honolulu automatically triggered the birth announcements)
Recently the Conservative (I live and vote in Arizona, Ken Bennett is no conservative, he is republican in name only, here is a picture of him and look he even looks like a liberal) secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona accepted it as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November. (Speechless, review the careful wording of the verification, Hawaii confirmed nothing of the such, it is true Bennett accepted it, but that is NOT listed in the federal rules of evidence. Nice try. He is on the ballot, but he will lose!)
Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of the long-form birth certificate that was passed around in the White House Press room, and the statement of the reporter who photographed it that she had felt the raised seal:
This is your expert witness: Savannah Guthrie
(No it is not! It is well documented that the Whitehouse released a PDF that only exists in cyberspace and any idiot with Illustrator and half a brain can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is not a scanned document, therefore the ‘image’ had to come from the PDF, not the other way around . . . sheesh. Savannah Guthrie is a reporter albeit not a very good one. Enohcock1 you moron, give that copy to Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse and they will have experts look at it, then let Savannah do what she does, report there findings. Do you really think she will be able to report the same spun facts as she found? Ya I didn’t think so!)
(Notice line 23 is cropped from the purported document. The line that that would state whether or not it is a foreign birth, that’s right Hawaii registers foreign births and issues short form COLBS to people born abroad, look it up! Damn it looks like Hawaii is ‘bout as corrupt as you are ehancock1 and that is no little feat! Your evidence is weak and has no weight against the truth!)
Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of Obama’s short form birth certificate, front and back. (You are a pathological liar you don’t know were factcheck.org got that short form birth certificate come on lets go to the known source whitehouse.gov I’m inserting a picture of it here for your benefit , notice I’ve circled the obliterated (altered) certificate number and the statement at the bottom of the COLB that states any alteration voids the thing. I know you are a little dense so pretend that those red circles are dots can you connect them THE COLB POSTED AT WHITEHOUSE.GOV ON IT’S FACE IS NOT VALID! Hello, hello is any body in there?)
Here is confirmation that it is the official birth certificate that Hawaii issues (Wow, just wow. Do you even read the links you post? In this post that you linked to Hawaii at this place and time says:
[B]ack then, the official record was a paper document with the title “certificate of live birth” (rather than “certification”), and it included “more information, such as the name of hospital, certifier’s name and title; attendant’s name and title, etc.” Hawaii no longer issues those old-style birth certificates:. . .
The article also states:
[I]t is a legal birth certificate, and, as the Honolulu Star-Bulletin notes, it is the only kind of birth certificate the state of Hawaii issues. . .
So enhancock1 do you know what that confirms? Remember this is your evidence not mine. This confirms that the “certificate of live birth’ posted on whitehouse.gov (the long form is a forgery the Hawaiian Department of health “no longer issues those old-style birth certificates” Thanks for helping us prove that! BTW the article also states: “This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.” I don’t have to ask you to know that you do not know what prima facie evidence is, maybe ya otta look it up.)
Here is one of the two confirmations (Oh ya and I’m the man in the moon.) by the officials in Hawaii under the Republican administration:
Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed twice. (You are a complete fraud that statement is a big fat lie: Akaobama’s half sister Maya was born in Indonesia, yet Hawaii issued her (along with thousands of others) a short form COLB stating she was born in Hawaii, don’t believe me research it! You really should get your facts straight, I’m beginning to get really embarrassed for you. The rest of the obots “evidence” is just more of the same, I think I’ve make my point, so I’m just gonna strike the rest of his lies!)
And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital
Here are the birth notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
Here is the Index Data:
And here is the fact that the Arizona secretary of state accepted the confirmation of the officials in Hawaii and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona in November. The confirmation of the officials in Hawaii is attached. If you read it, you will see that it confirms that ALL the facts on Obama’s published birth certificate “MATCH” the facts on the birth certificate in the files.
Obama’s mother lived in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that she went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961—and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the “born in Kenya” claim and found that it was false. Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days. And yet birthers believe there could be a chance that Obama was born outside of the USA, and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii, and the Index Data, and the birth notices in the newspapers, and the witness who said that she wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley—-are all lying about that fact.
Wow! Would you look at that?: the corrections in his statement is bigger than the statement itself. Go figure. I know that these people are fake, that is why there presence on this and other blog sites that fight for the truth, because it has not agenda like these unsophisticated moronic liberals post their comments anonymously unlike the administrator of this blog. I can’t say that I blame them, if I were to post such content I would not put my name to it either, I mean really who wants to look so patently stupid.
This is the first time by blog has been attacked by these mindless morons and when I saw how easy it would be to utterly destroy every bit of evidence that they put forward and how easy it would be to completely discredit every single insolent remark they made . . . well I just couldn’t resist. Just this once thou, all of their future comments go straight to the trash, were at least they will be surrounded by like minded garbage, good for them! I just can’t see wasting any more of my time on these morally bankrupt reprobates . . . Len.